Lando Norris Criticizes Stewards' Decision-Making: “Rushed, Guessing” Without Driver Input
- Hello @Stratastic
- Oct 21, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Jan 30

After a fierce battle with Max Verstappen at the United States Grand Prix, Lando Norris voiced concerns over the stewards’ approach to penalizing off-track overtakes, labeling it “rushed” and lacking driver input. Norris received a five-second penalty for his pass on Verstappen at Turn 12, where both drivers briefly left the track. This penalty ultimately cost him third place, as Verstappen’s lead over Norris extended by 57 points with only five rounds remaining.
Norris Challenges Stewarding Consistency and Decision-Making
Norris questioned the “inconsistency” in how penalties were applied, expressing frustration that stewards did not consider input from drivers or teams in making swift decisions to avoid altering race results. He stated:
“For me, it’s just a rushed decision, and they don’t hear or understand our points, which they should do after the race.”
Norris believes that the absence of driver feedback compromises the accuracy of stewarding, saying:
“I don’t think it’s maybe the most correct thing... It’s a penalty, and there’s not a lot I can do apart from just accept that.”
This particular incident raised concerns about how drivers’ perspectives could be beneficial in interpreting incidents, especially those requiring deeper insight into car control and defensive moves. Norris further commented,
“They don’t see everything, understand everything as well as we do when we’re inside the car.”
Norris on Racing Dynamics with Verstappen
Norris described the battle with Verstappen as intense and enjoyable, crediting Verstappen’s defensive tactics as highly skilled and challenging to counter. Despite the penalty and the setback in his championship hopes, Norris acknowledged the high-level racing involved:
“I tried, we both tried, it was a great battle... Max drove very well and defended very well.”
The decision to penalize Norris left him questioning why similar incidents, particularly at Turn 1, receive different scrutiny. Norris highlighted an early incident where Verstappen’s aggressive driving forced him off track, yet it did not attract penalties:
“With Max, you can’t just go half-hearted... I can’t just dive up the inside of someone, run off, and then keep the position... but for some reason, it’s completely OK on Turn 1 of lap one.”
The Debate over Stewards' Role and Drivers’ Insights
Norris’s comments bring attention to the challenges stewards face in balancing rapid decision-making with comprehensive evaluation, especially in cases where context from drivers might provide clarity. While Norris acknowledged the difficulty of the stewards’ job, he believes there’s room for improvement in allowing more transparency and input:“
It’s a difficult job for them to do, so I’m not complaining against them... I think it’s just more the fact they don’t see everything, understand everything as well as we do.”
As Formula 1 continues to evolve, the debate over the stewards' role and how they incorporate feedback will likely remain a hot topic, particularly in high-stakes situations like Norris and Verstappen's battle. Whether the sport will adapt its stewarding procedures remains to be seen, but Norris’s call for clearer, more consistent rulings reflects a desire shared by many drivers seeking fairness and transparency on the track.




Comments